Posts Tagged ‘chemo’

Health care in America doesn’t support health. Health care has adopted a very clear way of delivering wellness. It bypasses Mother Nature and goes to work interfering with natural healing.

Scary Health Care

There is an updated joint guideline by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) about the appropriate use of erythropiesis- stimulating agents (ESAs), a class of drugs that stimulate the bone marrow to produce more red blood cells, to treat cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. While the guideline cautions that ESAs are associated with shorter survival and increased risk of thromboembolism-blood clots-and tumor progression, it also recognizes their major benefit of reducing the need for red blood cell transfusions, which can potentially cause serious infections and adverse reactions in the immune system.

Enough said lets try something different, which will make a substantial impact on the condition. It is becoming increasingly clear that the battle is being fought on the wrong front, with the wrong weapons, and the wrong idea of what the enemy looks like.

What medicine does is try to reinvent the wheel. They are engaging a battle with a condition they don’t even understand. Without the answers to a few basic questions you can’t actually expect to come up with productive solutions. Healing is not a matter of going to war, but identifying and rectifying a condition. You have to support the immune system not destroy it.

It seems like the health care industry is on autopilot, they aren’t transformers of health, but Kamikazes. They are bent on destruction of a tumor at any costs, to the point of putting the patient in great jeopardy.

Healing is an Amazing Journey

What you do right now makes tomorrow. Most health problems are what you did before. Understanding this simple concept eludes the medical community.

To feel better now you have to be and act better now. Instead of trying to kill the messenger, you balance your body back to health.

What the medical profession doesn’t strive for is giving you the best quality and quantity of life. They don’t know how to. What you inhale, ingest, and absorb are every bit a part of the picture.

The common co-defendants are what is on your dinner plate, prescriptions, air pollution, stress level, and chemical exposure. So chemo isn’t detoxification it is a powerful response to a weaken condition. Now it will add discomfort, constipation, depression, memory loss, nausea, hair loss, and a host of other problems. Long lasting health, vitality and stamina are not a chemo formula away.       

Breast-giving them a healthy boost means preserving them not changing them. Automatically most people assume that a boost in their appearance comes from either surgery, or some uplifting undergarment. Smarter is to try to keep them and not turn them over to special-interest groups, which see them as a cash cow. Most medical professionals can’t do squat about really making them healthy.

They can remove them, radiate, and chemo you, but that doesn’t give you breast health. They are part of a whole system, and depend on a healthy environment to keep them in shape. There are better ideas, and solutions that seem to elude the medical establishment.

Breast Health Initiatives

Breast health initiatives have to be more than a whirlwind of doctors, digital pictures, cat scans, and operations. We have to changeover from a rigged robotic assembly line approach to a more humane and productive way of handling breasts.

When one realizes the significant mismanagement of their care, we realize we are fitting a round object into a square cube. It doesn’t fit; it is trimming parts off of real people without examining the toll that takes. First choice is to leave the packaging as intact as possible.

How do you do that?  Yes, it is a tough choice for people not to run to what they see as a solid supplier of FDA accepted approaches. What the crucial question should be: is this all there is. The war on cancer has been going on for over 50 years. It looks more like a war on your breasts; in that case the real winner is the pharmaceutical companies.  The first response for most people is an emotional one and that gives you insufficient data.

Off with the breast should be out of an Alice in Wonderland story, not a real life drama. We are not saying this approach is beyond redemption. But, the speed it is done without understanding how seamlessly the breast is integrated with the rest of the body’s functions. Lymph glands are there for a reason. They are a reliable defense agent, which has a specific job. Remove them and you lose the controllers at the helm.

Breast Support

Breast support comes from nutrition, physical activity, maintaining a healthy weight, and an overall healthy lifestyle. The best boost for your breast is staying healthy. The real question is what you do when the cow left the barn. The human body can fight for you and win the battle. You have to take responsibility for the materials you supply it with. You got the power, but usually not the strategy.

It is time to embrace a new kind of thinking, and not let things go too fast. Whatever, you do you need to put nature to work; she is on your side. You need to know that every step of the way you are in charge. So even if you decide you want a medical solution, you better have an understanding of what suits your needs.

Increasing your knowledge is the unsurpassed way to seriously take on breast health. Keep reading, sign up for our newsletter, and we will rinse, shake, drain, and serve you up food for thought.

Cancer and diet the missing link to restoring health. The war on cancer has been going on forever, it turned out as a way to manage corporation’s funds, but it hasn’t done much for the patients.

We wait for an unprecedented breakthrough. Findings that would not just extend lives but rewind the clock turning cancer cells back to normal. Everyone is expecting a new way to kill cancer cells. What is a better approach is turn unhealthy cells back to healthy ones.

This is what you want; the mainstream acceptance of bombarding cancer cells with toxic chemo, and. huge amounts of radiation is counter productive. The secret, nutrients in lieu of drugs, would go a long way to combat this condition.

Analytics                                

An analysis that included nearly 400,000 participants finds that those with higher blood levels of vitamin B6 and the essential amino acid methionine (found in most protein) had an associated lower risk of lung cancer, including participants who were current or former smokers, according to a study in the June 16 issue of JAMA.

Previous research has suggested that deficiencies in B vitamins may increase the probability of DNA damage and subsequent gene mutations. The authors write: “Given their involvement in maintaining DNA integrity and gene expression, these nutrients have a potentially important role in inhibiting cancer development, and offer the possibility of modifying cancer risk through dietary changes,” They add that deficiencies in nutrient levels of B vitamins have been shown to be high in many western populations.

One Step Further

Reversing cancer is also possible with the right lifestyle changes. Most medical doctors will not have the knowledge or courage to buck the system. Many patients have, and had stellar results. Others have taken main stream medicine one step further and combined some conventional treatment with a considerable amount of dietary changes.

Paul Brennan, Ph.D., of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, and colleagues conducted an investigation of B vitamins and methionine status based on serum samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort study, which recruited 519,978 participants from 10 European countries between 1992 and 2000, of whom 385,747 donated blood. By 2006, 899 lung cancer cases were identified and 1,770 control participants were individually matched by country, sex, date of birth, and date of blood collection.

Hello Success

The authors write: “Our results suggest that above-median serum measures of both B6 and methionine, assessed on average 5 years prior to disease onset, are associated with a reduction of at least 50 percent on the risk of developing lung cancer. An additional association for serum levels of folate was present, that when combined with B6 and methionine, was associated with a two-thirds lower risk of lung cancer,”

Now Turn it Around